Sunday, February 28, 2010


It seems it wasn't that long ago when parents around the country were outraged watching videos showing youngsters praising Obama in songs.  Remember BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MMM MMM MMM?  Next I read the the MEA was requiring teachers to read Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.  Now I received this info where Obama will spend our tax dollars to infiltrate Alinsky rules in our elementary schools using High School children.  And Bill O'Reilly says, he does not think Obama is a Socialist?  Pleaaaase!

Organizing Kids for Obama

by Phyllis Schlafly

President Barack Obama's budget has added more than $100 billion of federal taxpayers' money to what is called "education," so that means it will be spent by alumni of the Saul Alinsky school of radical community organizing and/or the Chicago Democratic machine. We're indebted to Pamela Geller of for exposing the shocking use of some of these funds.

Obama is using the public schools to recruit a private army of high-schoolers to "build on the movement that elected President Obama by empowering students across the country to help us bring about our agenda." We now know that Obama's "agenda" is to move the United States into European-style Socialism.

Obama's internet outreach during his campaign, Obama for America, has been renamed Organizing for America (OFA) in order to recruit students to join a cult of Obama and become activists for his goals. Geller discovered that the teacher of an 11th-grade government class in Massillon, Ohio, passed out the sign-up sheet, headed with Obama's "O" logo, asking students to become interns for Organizing for America.

These interns will be given an intensive nine-week training course using comprehensive lesson plans. Assigned readings include Saul Alinsky's notorious Rules for Radicals, Stir It Up: Lessons from Community Organizing and Advocacy by the left-wing activist Rinku Sen, and particular sections of Dreams From My Father dealing with Obama's days as a community organizer in Chicago.

Republican students will be filtered out of the intern program by requiring applicants to answer questions that reveal their politics. One example is, "What one issue facing our country is important to you and why?"

Geller said the purpose of this training to become Alinsky-style community organizers, is "of course, to elect more Democrats." The internship program is specifically geared to get the kids working in the 2010 elections.

The sign-up sheet for Organizing for America starts with this instruction: "Organizing for America, the successor organization to Obama for America, is building on the movement that elected President Obama by empowering students across the country to help us bring about our agenda of change." The application explains that this national internship program is "working to make the change we fought so hard for in 2008 a reality in 2010 and beyond."

This is not the first time Obama has tried to enlist schoolchildren into an Obama cult. Last fall, the instructions mailed to every school by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan added a very political dimension to Obama's speech that was broadcast to public school children on September 8.

Geller explained the extensive political dimension of the new intern program. The OFA student interns will be trained in the goals and language of the left: "anti-war agitation, anti-capitalism, Marx, Lenin, [Bill] Ayers, LGBT agenda promotion, global warming, soft-on-jihad, and illegal immigration."

Another item on OFA's reading list is The New Organizers by Zack Exley. It brags about "an insurgent generation of organizers" inside the Obama campaign that has "almost without anyone noticing ... built the Progressive movement a brand new and potentially durable people's organization, in a dozen states, rooted at the neighborhood level."

The ten-page "National Intern Organizer Curriculum" is very specific in describing the tactics that interns will be taught. It includes these components: "Using Story as an Organizing Tool, Building Relationships and Building Teams, Mobilizing to Win On the Issues (issue advocacy), Health Care Service Project."

Passage of Obamacare is one of this intern project's major goals. The curriculum promises to provide "insight on the strategy and plan behind the health care campaign" and "further motivate them to work on the issue."

The sign-up sheet states that the "purpose" of training these students is "to build community" among the interns and teach them "to be leaders in OFA's organizing work." After all, Barack Obama knows a great deal about being a community organizer; that was his only job before he got into politics.

Job prospects may be bleak for many Americans, but they will be rosy for alumni of Obama's intern program. After the students have been fully trained as Alinsky-style community organizers, they will be eligible for jobs in Senior Corps, AmeriCorps, or Learn and Serve America.
Those three so-called "service" organizations, which annually dole out millions of dollars to left-wing groups, are overseen by the Corporation for National and Community Service. The U.S. Senate just confirmed this Corporation's new chief executive, Patrick Corvington, who was a senior official of the Annie E. Casey Foundation, which has given over a million and a half dollars to the ACORN network of organizations.

Monday, February 22, 2010


How quickly they forget who helps them get elected.  One facebook writer said, he voted this way because he represented his people in MA.  That's fine, but he came to all of us for support, he promised us, he would not only look out for his constituents in MA but for the country.  He needs to move his truck further to the right.

A modest job-creation bill advanced in the U.S. Senate on Monday as the chamber's newest Republican bucked his party and sided with Democrats on a $15 billion package of tax cuts and highway spending.

Republican Scott Brown joined four other Republicans, 55 Democrats and two independents to overcome a procedural hurdle that sets up a final vote later this week.

Brown was widely hailed as a conservative hero after his surprise victory in Massachusetts last month gave Republicans enough seats to block most Democratic legislation.
His election prompted President Barack Obama and his fellow Democrats to call for increased bipartisanship, and an earlier version of the bill was written with Republican input.

But key Republicans withdrew their support after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid scaled it back.
Brown said the bill was not perfect but would help put people back to work.

"I hope my vote today is a strong step toward restoring bipartisanship in Washington," he said in a statement.

The bill includes a tax credit for businesses that hire unemployed workers, subsidies for state and local construction bonds and $19.5 billion to shore up a highway-construction fund.

Much of the cost is offset by a crackdown on offshore tax shelters.

(Reporting by Andy Sullivan, editing by Philip Barbara)
H/T Reuters

Friday, February 19, 2010


Three different bloggers ran with this story today, but yet we have heard nothing from the MSM or even on Cable.  This is not the first time that I noticed the media ignoring terror attempts.  You have to ask yourself, are they getting marching orders from DC?  I feel increasingly uneasy with Obama as Commander-in-Chief and in charge of the War on Terror.

"While lefty blogs are trying to make out this nut who ran his plane into a building into a 'teabagger', they are all ignoring a breaking story- the U.S. Army is investigating allegations that five Muslim soldiers were attempting to poison the food supply at Fort Jackson in South Carolina. All of the suspects were part of a Arabic translation program called "09 Lima" and use Arabic as their first language. Coming on the heels of the Fort Hood shooting, this is an important story to follow.

A source with intimate knowledge of the investigation, which is ongoing, told CBN News investigators that they suspected that the "Fort Jackson Five" may have been in contact with the group of five Washington, DC area Muslims that recently traveled to Pakistan to wage jihad against U.S. troops in December. That group was arrested by Pakistani authorities, also just before Christmas."

Hat Tip/A Conservative Teacher

Thursday, February 18, 2010


I signed the Mt. Vernon Statement.  Will you?


Although this doesn't really come as a surprise considering they are both the progressive kind.  Until now they just thought the Tea Party may have an effect on the Obama administration, but slowly they and all their cronies are realizing, we, the Tea Party folks are here to stay, and even once Obama is gone (can't wait for the day) the Tea Party movement will continue to go after all progressives. 

Clinton Plotting Tea Party Counterattack

Posted By Capitol Confidential On February 17, 2010
Last week, former President Clinton was rushed to the hospital in New York for an emergency heart operation. Medical experts said the procedure was “relatively routine” and predicted Clinton would make a full recovery and be back to his regular schedule soon. To the public, at least, that schedule revolves chiefly around earthquake relief efforts in Haiti. In fact, some Clinton associates cited the work in Haiti as exacerbating his heart condition. Clinton money man, Terry MacAuliffe, even noted that Clinton’s Haiti work continued right up until the operation:

Democrat colleague Terry McAuliffe said Mr Clinton had participated in a conference call on earthquake relief efforts as he was wheeled into the operating theatre.

We’ll take Terry’s word on that. But, Big Government has learned of at least one other conference call/meeting around this time. A meeting of former Clintonistas and senior Democrat political operatives to coordinate a push-back to the burgeoning tea party movement. Consider it a Democrat party relief effort.
When tea party, 9/12 and townhall protests and rallies first erupted on the national scene, they were derided by national politicos as astroturf or a small fringe movement. Lefty journalists at MSNBC, CNN and elsewhere laughed away the movement with derogatory, pornographic references.

Then, Scott Brown won election to the U.S. Senate from Massachusetts. No one is laughing anymore. In fact, Democrats are facing political annihilation this November. Not only do Democrats face the possibility of losing their congressional majorities, massive losses in state house races could jeopardize redistricting next year and set back the progressive agenda for at least a decade.

So, the Clinton Empire is planning to strike back.

Big Government has learned that Clintonistas are plotting a “push/pull” strategy. They plan to identify 7-8 national figures active in the tea party movement and engage in deep opposition research on them. If possible, they will identify one or two they can perhaps ‘turn’, either with money or threats, to create a mole in the movement. The others will be subjected to a full-on smear campaign. (Has MSNBC already been notified?)

Big Government has also learned that James Carville will head up the effort.

Obviously, there is no love lost between Obama and the Clinton machine. It may at first seem odd that Clinton would rush to Obama’s defense, but the tea party movement poses a threat far beyond the immediate goals of the Obama Administration.

The tea party movement could evolve into a new political realignment, one founded on a belief in limited government and less government interference in the economy. The Progressive agenda, which has been painstakingly built up over the last three decades, could be left in tatters.

As the Clinton’s know, “politics ain’t beanbag.” Expect the counterattack soon. Don’t say you haven’t been warned.

Monday, February 15, 2010


The following essay was written by Robert Palmer (R), Candidate for State Senate, Michigan 31st District

In his book “The Law” Frederic Bastiat defines the law; “It is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense”. 1 You might note that the word ‘defense’ is primary to the ‘individual’ and their right to make sure they are secure in those things the individual directly controls, their life, liberty and property. Every man, woman and child is “endowed with certain unalienable Rights,”2 according to the founding document of this Nation, the ‘Articles of Incorporation of the United States of America’, which is known today as the Declaration of Independence. This contract is one that can not be broken or the whole concept of a ‘United States’ fails.

While it is commonly taught that the ‘United States Constitution’ is the founding National document nothing could be farther from the truth. The “Contract between the States” that binds them together is the Declaration of Independence. The ‘Law that comes from that contract’ is the United States Constitution. Why is this important? The Declaration of Independence is concerned with the concept of ‘personal’ liberty which is to be monitored by the States for the sake of the individual. The States “deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”3 then advise and control the Federal Government. At least that is the way it was until recent history.

Between the 1820-40’s a man began to have a great deal of influence based on his written commentaries on ‘absolutes’ such as absolute rights, absolute wrongs, even the concept of an absolute static legal document or Bible. His name was Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and two of his most ardent supporters where C.C. Langdell and Roscoe Pound. Pound was a student of Langdell and both at one time sat as the Dean of the Harvard School of Law. And, they created and implemented a plan to change the United States Legal System which was created by the ‘Contract between the States’ from common law to case law.

Why is this important? The plan that they implemented resulted in a complete understanding of the original meaning of the ‘Law of the Land’ or ‘Rule of Law”, the United States Constitution. Based upon their plan, and in direct contradiction to all of the writers or and students of the framers of the Constitution they determined to indoctrinate every United States citizen into the ideology of a ‘living Constitution’. Since they saw no moral absolutes and because Pound, a botanist rather than a lawyer, believed in absolute evolution it was a direct jump to an ‘evolving’ Constitution. Every school child for the last 80 years has learned that common law is ‘too strict and unbending’ while case law allows for the courts to interpret and change the law to meet growing societal needs.

John Doe saves a thousand drowning people and is declared a hero. Later it is found that John Doe is a child molester and has murdered a child for his perversion. Under common law the fact that he was a hero is not an extenuation of who he is or what he has done. The case is simple; he has murdered a child for his perversion and is subject to the strict sense of the law. However, under the newer case law concept the courts have decided to take in to account not only his heroic salvation of the thousand, but also his terrible childhood and self-proclaimed molestation by his father. Under case law these extenuating circumstances allow a ‘less stringent’ application of the law.

The natural mind understands the extra circumstances do not alleviate the fact that John Doe is a child molesting murderer. But, the Hegelian mind says that the whole of society is ‘responsible’ for the action of John Doe. After all, society ‘allowed’ the alleged molestation of John Doe. And, the whole of society must hold Johns heroism up as a mitigating factor. We have become slaves to the law, rather than having the law save us from slavery. This story is hypothetical, but we see stories like it in the news each year.

To make matters even worse this type of thinking is taken from the Federal level backwards through our system to the State and then local Governments. Remember, our system is one that moves from the people to the State to the National Government, or at least it was. We are now held slaves to the actions of others by the will of the Federal Government. The same Government that derives its power from the permission of the people through the governance of the State. This is only one instance of the overthrow of the concept of liberty in our society. However, these two small changes; the change from common law to case law and then the application of case law from the Federal level to the State and local level is enough to remove our liberty at every level.

The only natural conclusion to such a change in the law is as stated above a complete failure of the original concept of a ‘United States’. From liberty to slavery in one fell swoop brought about by the changing of minds, not the changing of laws, or circumstance. Under the current ‘case law’ schema the courts legislate from the bench and we are betrayed. We lose our right to control the passage of power from the people, to the State to the National Government. This ‘natural’ order once destroyed allowed the legislature to do almost anything they wished in writing and distributing laws.

The legislature which under our constitution is the only one with the right to ‘spend’ simply writes a loosely worded bill and lets the courts determine what the bill means and who can or can’t be paid, who can or can’t print money and what can or can not be used in place of legal tender. The end result is that the liberty each of us once had is now enslaved to an economic system that is neither free-market nor socialism, a system that is more banter than barter, more binding than liberating. Of course that leads us to how do we change this travesty?

The answer is to restore the stolen State Sovereignty that has always been the wall of separation between the people and the National Government. Today many States are in the process of establishing in their Constitutions amendments that will make it much more difficult for the Federal Governmental system to intrude upon the individual’s liberty. The end truth is that we will have to start with that one process and go even farther. We must get the Federal Government out of our decision making process at the State level in every instance. Our educational systems must come first, teaching once again what the founders knew must always be taught.

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of Masters”4 “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other”5 “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports”6 There is the answer to whether we will continue to live in both criminal and economic slavery instituted by lawyers and courts or regain our liberty by setting aside the Courts constant prattle about a non-existent separation of Church and State. We must set aside the false premise that we can not legalize morality, all laws have a moral basis, and once again teach the truth of our Nations founding; speak again about the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God”7

We must once again open our history books to the biblical beginnings of our Country and the moral basis of not only our United States Constitution and the now trampled Bill of Rights.

1. The Law, Frederic Bastiat

2. Declaration of Independence, paragraph 2

3. ibid

4. Benjamin Franklin

5. John Adams

6. George Washington, the Farwell Address

7. Declaration of Independence, paragraph 1


Two days before Valentine's Day we were blessed with our third grandchild, a second boy named Brayden. Although we live too far apart to be there at birth, we were there in spirit during the last week and days. When finally the news came it was 12:30 a.m. and of course, that was the end of my sleep for that night.  Babies get me all excited and I can't wait to get to the south in a few weeks to hold this adorable little guy myself.  But, at the same time I know, we must keep fighting our fight, this guy was born with a huge amount of debt on his back, thanks to his government,  and he doesn't even know it.  How terribly unfair this is.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010


Yesterday I posted a press release from my congressman, Gary Peters, in which he announced that he will double the funding for displaced refugees.  Yes, it sounds noble and my complaining about it makes me a coldhearted rightwing nut. But listen up.  We are 12,3 trillion in debt, we have 107 trillion in unfunded liabilities, we have millions of people without jobs and their unemployment will run out eventually.  We have displaced citizens among us and Peters is doubling the funding for refugees NOW?!  What is he thinking? There's got to be a group behind  this (again) who made a real nice campaign contribution to him. It seems now he's not only Nancy's lapboy anymore, now he belongs to the highest bidder. Besides Obama he's the reason that made me start blogging, facebooking, tweeting and going to tea parties.  I will not rest until this man is replaced, hopefully by Rocky Raczkowski
You can read the press release here: Rocky Raczkowski explained to us that yes, we caused the Chaldean's plight and basicly have no problem with helping them, but what most people don't know is that the Refugee Admission Program also applies to 50 -70,000 Somalies that we bring in, house them, teach them English and after two years they return to Somalia where they train to be terrorist and then kill our soldiers with roadside bombs or in other ways. 

That's why I think Gary Peters is not only a far left liberal but now he also turns out to be dangerous.

Friday, February 5, 2010


The Liberal View
This is TRUE!!! And she is upset that she has to 'make do'.......

Sharon in her Section 8 home!
Sharon Jasper has spent 57 of her 58 years dedicated to one cause and one cause only, and has nothing to show for her dedicated servitude...

She has lived in Section 8 housing all but 1 of her 58 years. It was a legacy passed down from her parents who moved into Section 8 housing in 1949 when she was six months old. She has passed the legacy down to her children, but fears they may have to get jobs to pay for the utilities and deposits.

She laments about her one year hiatus from the comfort of her Section 8 nirvana, 'I tried it for a year -- you know, working and all. It's not anything I would want to go through again, or wish on anyone in my family, but I am damn proud of that year.'

Sharon was moved out of her St. Bernard housing project after hurricane Katrina and into a new, yet albeit, substandard quarterage. As can be noted from the above photo of her new Section 8 home, it is repugnant and not suitable for someone of Sharon Jasper's seniority status in the system. 'Don't be fooled by them hardwood floors,' says Sharon .

'They told me they were putting in scraped wood floors cause it was more expensive and elegant, but I am not a fool -- that was just a way to make me take scratched up wood because I am black. The 60 inch HD TV? It may look nice but it is not plasma.. It's not a plasma because I'm black. Now they want me to pay a deposit and utilities on this dump 'Do you know why?'

She has held her tongue in silence through the years of abuse by the system, but it came to a head at the New Orlean's city council meeting where discussions were under way about the tearing down of the St. Bernard projects. When a near riotous exchange between groups opposing the tearing down of St. Bernard and groups wanting the dilapidated buildings torn down and newer ones built, Sharon unleashed verbal hell with her once silenced tongue. The object of her oratory prowess was an acquiescent poor white boy in attendance. The context of her scathing rebuke was, 'Just because you pay for my house, my car, my big screen and my food, Medical needs. I will not be treated like a slave!' and 'Back up and Shut up! white boy Shut up, white boy!

Recapping from the log of the city council minutes; Sharon repines, 'Our families have been displaced all over the United States. They are being forced to commit crimes in cities they are unfamiliar with. It is a very uncomfortable situation for them. Bring them back, then let's talk about redevelopment.'

Sharon directs the reporter's attention across the street to Duncan Plaza where homeless people are living in tents and states that, 'I might do better out there with one of these tents.' She further lamented her sentiments about her situation, 'I might be poor, but I don't have to live poor.'

Any wonder why this country is in the shape it is? Maybe we should all just chip in and get her the plasma TV she so richly deserves!

Remember to pay your taxes - Sharon needs your help -

Spread the wealth !

The Conservative View
H/T Tereseamerica and The Humble Libertarian


Although this is not a current "Hot Topic" I felt the need to pass this on.  While our eyes and ears are following Tea Parties, Health Care and elections, this is still happening in the background and around the Nation, and with Obama's sympathy towards the Muslim world, this makes this more than ever a subject to keep an eye on. I sure would hate to leave this world controlled by Sharia Law knowing what my granddaughter would have to endure.

Joys of Muslim Women

by Nonie Darwish


In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.

Even though a woman is abused she can not obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.

The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion..

The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

In the West World ( America ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife can not obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.

By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Ripping the West in Two.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamist's is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.

She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law..

Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel . He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza .

When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.

But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.

In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping Sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.

For the West, she says radical Islamist's are working to impose Sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.

Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.

While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Sharia teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Sharia encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.

While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Sharia advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.

It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.

While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA .. Dearborn Mich. is one... and there are others...

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.. some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While America is getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America ..

This is your chance to make a difference...!