Friday, December 9, 2011


Frank Beckman, one of my favorite radio hosts from Detroit has a way of articulating so often how I fell but can't put it into words.  Read his article here:

The core belief of every collectivist — whether described as communists, socialists, or Statists — always revolves around the belief that a few are smarter than all others and, as such, capable of determining what creates happiness for everyone.
Any suspicion that President Barack Obama does not deserve one of the above descriptions was dispelled in his speech in Osawatomie, Kan., this week.
Obama deliberately channeled Theodore Roosevelt's appearance in the same Midwestern town a century earlier, when he delivered an address titled: "The New Nationalism."
While badly missing Roosevelt's mark, Obama also revealed himself as a willing class warrior, a Luddite reincarnate, and an uninformed preschool candidate for Econ 101.
When Roosevelt spoke in 1910, he advocated a collective approach to caring for people but he also extolled the virtues of capitalism, the system that has driven America to enjoy the greatest economy in mankind's history. Roosevelt actually quoted Abraham Lincoln extensively in his address and paid special tribute to capitalism.
"Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights … Nor should this lead to a war upon the owners of property. Property is the fruit of labor; … property is desirable; is a positive good in the world," said Lincoln/Roosevelt.
Obama, who has hailed the efforts of the anti-capitalist Occupy Wall Street movement, had no such praise for the American economic system.
Instead, Obama complained about the wealth gap, ignored personal responsibility in accumulating debt and blamed job losses on technology.
He cited the minimum wage and unemployment benefits for enriching America, but failed to credit the productive elements of the U.S. economy, led by good old-fashioned self interest.
Amazingly, he advocated the basic productive quality of the free enterprise system when he cited Henry Ford as the best example of a benevolent boss because he increased worker pay so employees could buy his cars.
Ford did so out of self interest, not for any altruistic reason and not because government forced him to do so.
Continue reading the article at below link:

From The Detroit News:

Thursday, December 8, 2011


 Holder kills 200 Mexicans and 2 federal agents. Corzine steals $600 million, Kagan lies to Senate confirmation panel, Frank and Dodd destroy the housing market which destroys the economy, Pelosi gets millions $$$ from insider trading while she and Maxine Waters direct US contracts to family members, they shove Obama Care down our throats, Obama turns Egypt over to the Muslim Brotherhood, helps organize OWS, the Clintons torture and kill 90 civilians at Waco, the Dept. of Ed. chief is a pervert and I can go on and on with examples and you still vote Democrat?
H/T Jerry Dagna

Please use the comment section to add more reasons

Thursday, September 29, 2011


This is a must watch video.

Please share far and wide. Everyone needs to know this before we hit the point of no return.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011


A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:

U.S. 65%

England 46%

Canada 42%

Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
U.S. 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%

Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
U.S. 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%

Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
U.S. 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%

Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S. 71
England 14
Canada 18

Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in "excellent health":
U.S. 12%
England 2%
Canada 6%

And now for the last statistic:

National Health Insurance?
England YES
Canada YES

Check this last set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is…a real-life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt................... 38%
Taft................................... 40%
Wilson.............................. 52%
Harding........................... 49%
Coolidge......................... 48%
Hoover............................. 42%
F. Roosevelt................... 50%
Truman............................ 50%
Eisenhower.................... 57%
Kennedy......................... 30%
Johnson.......................... 47%
Nixon............................... 53%
Ford.................................. 42%
Carter............................... 32%
Reagan............................ 56%
GH Bush......................... 51%
Clinton............................. 39%
GW Bush......................... 55%
Obama..................... 8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration: only 8% of them have ever worked in private business! 

That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!

And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business? 

How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers." They should have been in an employment line. 

"One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be governed by your inferiors." Plato 

Saturday, September 17, 2011


Nothing new, but a credible source indicating that following through with the agenda is potentially dangerous and illegal.

Dear Friends,

Today, I completed the initial phase of notification of major utility companies in the Southeast US of the substantial legal and financial risk they face from imposition of manmade global warming laws, regulations or any action based on the failed anthropogenic global warming (AGW) or manmade global warming theory.

This notification was in the form of the recently published letter to Florida Governor Rick Scott. A copy is attached. Other information including a related article from Dr. Rich Swier at was also sent. The article is attached.

The effort is to bring to the attention of utility executives that new scientific evidence shows that the AGW theory is unreliable, that greenhouse gasses caused by mankind's industrial activity have at best, a miniscule impact on climate. It further establishes that attempts to mitigate atmospheric content through carbon credit trading, or other means like carbon sequestration, not only will not help but may be both a net financial loss and potentially illegal.

The companies so notified are:

1. Southern Company - CEO Mr. Thomas Fanning

2.Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) - CEO and GM Mike Ksionek

3.NextEra Energy, Inc (Parent co. of Florida Power and Light) - Corporate Media Office.

4. Progress Energy, Inc - Chairman, CEO William D. "Bill" Johnson

I will continue to extend the notification to other utility companies and state governors.

Please feel free to use this email or the attachments as you wish for public or private communication as they are in the public domain.

Best Regards,

John Casey

John L. Casey
Space and Science Research Corporation
P.O.Box 607841
Orlando, FL 32860
            (407) 667-4860

Space and Science Research Corporation
P.O. Box 607841
* Orlando, FL 32860
TEL:             407-667-4860       *

Office of the Governor Rick Scott
 State of Florida The Capitol
400 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee, FL 32399-0001

September 6, 2011

SUBJECT: Termination of State Initiatives in Support of Manmade Global Warming.

Dear Governor Scott,

This letter is sent to request that your office take immediate action to terminate any and all initiatives by the State of Florida, including rescission of all past legislation that was based upon the impact on the Earth’s climate by greenhouse gasses caused by human industrial exhaust and other human related activities.
The primary reason for this special request is based on an overwhelming new set of evidence that shows that the science for manmade global warming, or anthropogenic global warming (AGW), from greenhouse gas emissions is invalid.
It is widely known that much of the science on climate change and predictions for AGW- generated future climate effects on the Earth, especially that originating from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN-IPCC) since 1988, has been based on predetermined outcomes, incomplete research, manipulated data, flawed global climate models (GCM), and a substantial overestimate of the impact of greenhouse gasses (GHG), especially human generated CO2, on the Earth’s climate.
Further, the advent of a new and potentially dangerous cold climate era which has just begun, essentially eliminates the AGW theory as an effective tool for understanding global climate change. This fait accompli is the result of the AGW theory’s fundamental assertion that as long as CO2 continues to rise (which it is still doing) then the Earth’s atmospheric temperatures can only go up, and never down. Yet, the new cold climate is taking them down for decades to come.
The rare and dramatic reduction in the Sun’s energy output which has brought on this new climate era is called a “grand solar minimum” by solar physicists or more appropriately, a “solar hibernation.” Once the Sun enters a state of hibernation, the subsequent, inescapable record cold climate that follows is typically thirty years long or more and regrettably, is unstoppable!
First announced by me to the White House, Congress, and the mainstream media in April and May of 2007, this historic change in the Sun has recently been confirmed by NASA, the US Air Force, and the National Solar Observatory. Other prominent scientists years before had done research similar to mine and like me discovered the specific 206 year solar cycle that drives these cold climate changes as well as the preceding run up or global warming that is also part of these natural cycles of the Sun that control the Earth’s climate.
Given the validation of the arrival of the next climate period and its true nature, some scientists have even gone so far as to say this new climate will be a repeat of “The Little Ice Age” of the 1600’s and 1700’s. The SSRC position is that it will not be as cold as that but highly destructive nonetheless. Much of the background on this subject is also documented in my recently released book titled “Cold Sun” which is described in more detail at The book has received worldwide praise from leading scientists and other experts.
On August 29, 2011, I injected this new climate information in the form of a public input into one of many pending pieces of Florida laws and regulation, specifically, the Action Plan of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). I have attached for your consideration, an enhanced version of that input – a summary describing major elements of understanding of the present state of climate change science and analysis.
In addition, there are four important matters which I would like to bring to your attention attendant to the review of climate change oriented legislation within the State of Florida.
First, it is likely that some officials in the state, including within the environmental, energy and education sectors have been well aware that the science behind greenhouse gas emissions and the UN reports was deeply flawed and unreliable, if not intentionally manipulated. Yet even with this knowledge they may have used state funds and their authority to justify and push forward with programs in support of manmade global warming under the guise of “sustainable development,” and environmental protection, similar to that found in the FWC Action Plan. Some officials may have known that the science behind their programs and legislative actions was unreliable and yet helped advance such despite this knowledge. These actions may be regarded as a violation of their fiduciary responsibilities, malfeasance in office, and actionable.
Second, by one account, the Obama administration’s 2011 federal budget includes over $2.5 billion devoted to manmade climate change research and associated programs. I am unaware what the climate change funds picture in Florida is. However, given that the expenditure of any funds for global warming in the state is now highly suspect, it is likely that the state may be able to save a substantial amount of money by an independent review of the state programs that have been based on the disproven science of manmade global warming and manmade climate change.
Third, since the state has no initiatives what so ever to address the only climate we are now facing, namely thirty years of record cold, I strongly recommend the state immediately act to correct this imbalance, and inform and protect its citizens as state authority and resources permit.
Fourth, it may be regarded as fraudulent where there are individuals and companies in the state who have been pursuing business with the full knowledge that manmade global warming science was unreliable, that global warming did not exist and that in fact we are heading into decades of cold weather. Schemes to take advantage of the state or its citizens or investors that are reliant on the bad science of AGW may also be found actionable. This includes such programs as trading in carbon credits, development of carbon mitigation or carbon sequestration programs. In fact, where publicly traded stock companies are involved, such programs may well fall within the definition of trading in “worthless securities” as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and result in criminal prosecution.
I recommend that all government controlled or funded programs in the state tied to manmade global warming, including within the environmental, energy, and education sectors be stopped immediately pending an independent review of the science, structure, and intent of these programs. This review should be conducted by an objective body of experts outside of those who were involved in the development of these state programs or associated business activities.
Please feel free to contact me at any time on this subject.
Best Regards,
John L. Casey President
Encl: Climate Change Summary
Space and Science Research Corporation Orlando, Florida
Climate Change Summary September 6, 2011
1. Global warming ended years ago. Importantly, it ended right on schedule!
2. There has been no effective growth in the Earth’s temperatures for thirteen years. Global warming no longer exists!
3. Climate change was always caused primarily by variations in the Sun’s activity in conjunction with the motions and orientations of the Earth-Moon system and the other planets.
4. Mankind’s contribution to climate change via greenhouse gas emissions has been miniscule, at most.
5. The role of greenhouse gasses in climate change, in particular carbon dioxide (CO2), has been grossly overstated.
6. Global temperature averages for the atmosphere and the oceans are on a long term decline.
7. The Sun has begun its next “solar hibernation.” This regular, repeating cycle will bring significant cold to the Earth for decades as it has done roughly every 206 years for at least the last 1,200 years.
8. The extent of cold associated with these solar hibernations is such that they pose a grave threat to Florida’s citizens, which among several ill-effects, will adversely impact the availability of basic food supplies. This cold era is expected to cause widespread destruction of Florida’s crops, especially citrus, ornamental and cold sensitive crops as well as to ecosystems and all their natural inhabitants. While the worst effects will occur around the bottom of the 206 year cycle in 2031, initial adverse impacts are already starting to be felt. Global cold weather records over the last few years have already passed 100 years marks and will only continue to set new records as the hibernation deepens.
9. The reports of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN-IPCC) as well as many of those of the EPA and NOAA that rely on the UN reports, contain significant errors and omissions which preclude their use as reliable climate change science references. For example, the widely known “hockey stick” chart and associated data depicting the last 1,000
years of the Earth’s temperature has been completely debunked and is now recognized as an inaccurate history of global temperature trends and a clearly misleading attempt to correlate mankind’s industrial activity with global temperature. State laws and regulations that also use these reports are likewise unreliable.
10. The past “Climategate” scandal, the posting of hacked emails between UN researchers, has provided serious reason to believe that vital scientific data was manipulated to fit flawed climate models, rather than reflect the reality of the Earth’s climate. The resultant resignation of the head of one of the main climate research organizations that provided data to the United Nations is indicative of the level of culpability of data manipulation in the UN-IPCC reports.
11. Global climate models (GCM) used to support the UN reports and anthropogenic global warming (AGW) have never been objectively and independently validated as reliable predictors of global climate change, and in fact are routinely wrong when compared with global temperature trends and historical records. Simply put, they just don’t work.
12. There are other highly reliable models and theories, both domestically and internationally available to the State of Florida (the RC Theory, for example). These are based on solar cycles which offer much more dependability and confidence for climate-related legislation and regulatory actions vs. the unreliable UN GCM’s based on mankind’s greenhouse gas emissions. Solar-climate studies and theories have demonstrated an accuracy of over 90% in accounting for past climate changes. The RC Theory, in fact correctly predicted the new cold climate.
13. The core threat to Florida posed in the Action Plan, namely that of rising sea levels is no longer correct. Recent data shows the annual change of sea level rise has been declining for more than a decade and is now negative, i.e. sea level growth has stopped. Also, a long term declining trend is in place and is expected to continue since global warming has ended and the Earth’s oceans have begun a long term cool down that is forecast to last for decades.

Thursday, June 30, 2011


To my readers:  A fellow facebook friend and patriot posted this and with her permission I  wanted to pass it on as I couldn't have said  it better.

So, my fellow Christian Conservative Patriots, our elected officials have sold us out. They have taken our tax dollars, and used them for selfish and immoral purposes. They've given money to our enemies for years. They invite our enemies to come live amongst us, and give them free government handouts from our hard-earned wages. And those same thieves are now voting against us in all important matters of life, including our rights to freedom of religion. Immorality is at an alarming low, and getting worse daily. We're losing our jobs, homes, and savings due to the very policies they put in place, yet they refuse to change course, or do what's right for America. We stupidly keep electing the same immoral, criminal people to rule over us. 

Congress and our courts refuse to address the issue of Obama's eligibility. Why? What is their payoff? I am done with our corrupt politicians. They won't get a single penny from me, or my vote again, because I don't see them impeaching the illegal terrorist usurper in the White House, prosecuting those gunrunning at the ATF, closing our borders, etc. In general, I don't see our legislators doing what is right for us. 

Complaining won't change things. They aren't listening and don't care. They have guaranteed pensions and healthcare, while they steal, and ruin ours. That we haven't stopped them, or changed the regime, removed them from office is quite troubling to me. That we lose more freedoms everyday is terrifying. That we haven't shut down the propaganda machines called public broadcasting, is disheartening. 

The knowledge that my fellow Americans allow their children to continue attending the public indoctrination centers for their "education," and continue allowing those precious children to be spoonfed Communist, Humanistic, false science garbage, while promoting false religions, and denying freedom of the Christian religion, to me is appalling. 

Knowing that few attend city council or township meetings, barely know those whom they are electing to reign over them is inconceivable. My fellow Americans have put their own very lives into the hands of a corrupt, immoral group of Globalist "elites," who are trying to dictate every aspect of our lives, from the foods we eat, to what we can do in our homes and businesses, and the list goes on... That so few fight the creeping Communism/Socialism/Marxism/Progressivism/Fascism (or whatever label you choose to assign), and even Sharia law, and evil ideologies is beyond comprehension. 

Can anyone tell me how Obama is still in office? Why is Soros not in prison for war crimes, and allowed to continue destroying nations? Why aren't we fighting the Federal Reserve's raping of America? Why does our Federal Government refuse to secure our borders? And why are we doing nothing to stop this madness? We have become a nation of blind, shortsighted, incompetent fools. I am losing faith in my fellow Americans.

H/T Anne Phelps - Facebook group: Standup Speak out

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Monday, May 9, 2011


As early as January of 2005, high-ranking officials were discussing the best way to sell the idea of North American “integration” to the public and policymakers while getting around national constitutions. The prospect of creating a monetary unit to replace national currencies was a hot topic as well.

Some details of the schemes were exposed in a secret 2005 U.S. embassy cable from Ottawa signed by then-Ambassador Paul Cellucci. The document was released by WikiLeaks on April 28. But so far, it has barely attracted any attention in the United States, Canada, or Mexico beyond a few mentions in some liberty-minded Internet forums.

Numerous topics are discussed in the leaked document — borders, currency, labor, regulation, and more. How to push the integration agenda features particularly prominently.

Under the subject line “Placing a new North American Initiative in its economic policy context,” American diplomatic personnel in Canada said they believed an “incremental” path toward North American integration would probably gain the most support from policymakers. Apparently Canadian economists agreed.

The cable also touts the supposed benefits of merging the three countries and even mentions what elements to “stress” in future “efforts to promote further integration.” It lists what it claims is a summary of the “consensus” among Canadian economists about the issues, too.

Merging the United States, Canada, and Mexico
Integration is a little-used term employed mainly by policy wonks. But while it may sound relatively harmless, it generally describes a very serious phenomenon when used in a geopolitical context — the gradual merging of separate countries under a regional authority.

Similar processes are already well underway in Europe, Africa, and South America. And according to critics, the results — essentially abolishing national sovereignty in favor of supranational, unaccountable governance — have been an unmitigated disaster. But the U.S. government doesn’t think so.

In North America, integration has been proceeding rapidly for years. The New American magazine was among the first to report on the efforts to erect what critics have called a “North American Union,” encompassing Canada, the United States, and Mexico. But more recently, the topic has received more attention.

After the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) — similar in many ways to the European Common Market that preceded the political union in Europe — the integration scheme has only accelerated. And the bipartisan efforts have been going on for years.

Under President George W. Bush, integration occurred through the little-known “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.” And with the Obama administration, the process, now virtually out in the open, is only accelerating.

Back in 2005, the cable released recently by WikiLeaks explained how it would be done. And looking back, the document was right on the mark.
Moving Forward

The best way forward, according to the cable, is via gradual steps. “An incremental and pragmatic package of tasks for a new North American Initiative (NAI) will likely gain the most support among Canadian policymakers,” the cable states in its summary.

“Our research leads us to conclude that such a package should tackle both ‘security’ and ‘prosperity’ goals,” the document claims, using the two key words that have been emphasized at every step along the way. “This fits the recommendations of Canadian economists who have assessed the options for continental integration.”

Toward the end, the cable offers more advice on how to advance the integration agenda by tailoring the narrative. “When advocating [the North American Initiative to integrate the three countries], it would be better to highlight specific gains to individual firms, industries or travelers, and especially consumers,” the cable states, noting that it’s harder to “estimate the benefits” on a national or continental scale.

Unsubstantiated Claims

In a section headlined “North American Integration: What We Know,” the cable offers nothing but praise for the merging of the continent’s once-sovereign nations that had already been achieved.

“Past integration (not just NAFTA but also many bilateral and unilateral steps) has increased trade, economic growth, and productivity,” it claims, despite the fact that countless economists disagree. Of course, true free-trade advocates also correctly point out that the thousands of pages of regulations making up the agreements should hardly be considered examples of genuine free trade.

So-called “security,” the other big integration selling point, is featured prominently in the document as well. “A stronger continental ‘security perimeter’ can strengthen economic performance,“ the cable states. “It could also facilitate future steps toward trilateral economic integration, such as a common external tariff or a customs union.”
And law enforcement “cooperation” is good too, the embassy and the U.S. ambassador claim matter-of-factly.

“Cooperative measures on the ‘security’ side, a critical focus of current bilateral efforts, can deliver substantial, early, and widespread economic benefits,” the cable alleges, offering no evidence to substantiate the assertions.

“Security and law enforcement within North America have evolved rapidly since 9/11,” it continues. “Collaboration to improve these processes could yield efficiency improvements which would automatically be spread widely across the economy, leading to general gains in trade, productivity, and incomes.”

The Alleged “Consensus”

According to the document, “many” economists agree with the scheme. The cable says they support the principle of “more ambitious integration goals” such as a customs union, a single market, and even a continental currency to replace the dollar. On top of that, they supposedly believe such a union should involve all three major North American countries — the United States, Mexico, and Canada.

The cable cautions, however, that “most” of the economists believe the gradual approach is “most appropriate” — for now, at least. And all of them apparently agree that such an approach “helps pave the way to these goals if and when North Americans choose to pursue them.”

The embassy cable also included a summary of what it calls the “professional consensus” among Canadian economists on various issues related to integration.

“At this time, an ‘incremental’ approach to integration is probably better than a ‘big deal’ approach,” the document states under the “process” subheading, supposedly referring to the economists’ opinions. “However, governments should focus on choosing their objectives, and not on choosing a process.”

Next in the cable is the question of “border vs. perimeter,” as the formerly secret document puts it. “Even with zero tariffs, our land borders have strong commercial effects,” the embassy said. However, “some” of the effects — such as law enforcement and “data gathering” — are described as “positive.”

“Canada and the United States already share a security perimeter to some degree; it is just a question of how strong we want to make it,” the 2005 document notes. Apparently Canadians’ main reason for seeking a perimeter approach to security and borders, as opposed to a border between the two nations, is to avoid the “risk” that “discretionary” U.S. decisions to stop terror or disease might impede commerce. And evidently, the nations’ rulers did decide to make the perimeter stronger.

As The New American reported in February, U.S. President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper met in Washington, D.C., to hammer out a deal on solidifying the common “perimeter” around the two countries. Also part of the agreement, which conspicuously bypassed both countries’ legislatures, was a diminished role for the nations’ shared border. The development of a biometric system to track North Americans was agreed to as well, as were numerous other controversial measures.

In terms of labor markets, the so-called “consensus” among the unidentified Canadian economists is also — surprise! — the pursuit of even more integration. “Many Canadian economists point to labor markets — both within and among countries — as the factor market [sic] where more liberalization would deliver the greatest economic benefits for all three countries,” the document states.

Next, the cable release by WikiLeaks highlights another startling proposition about how to achieve an end-run around the Canadian Constitution. “Inter-provincial differences [in regulation] are important here, since Canada's federal government does not have the benefit of a U.S.-style ‘interstate commerce’ clause,” the document states. “While much of the problem is domestic in nature, an international initiative could help to catalyze change.”

Yes, the U.S. embassy referred to the wildly abused and misapplied “commerce clause” as a “benefit” that Canada lacks. And it actually suggested, hiding behind unnamed “economists,” that the constitutional “problem” could be minimized by foisting an “international initiative” on the Canadian people.

The cable also claims the “economists” support a customs union, a feature developed in the European Union once the integration process was well established. “A common external tariff, or a customs union which eliminated NAFTA's rules of origin (ROO), is economically desirable,” it states.

And finally, the document summarizes the “consensus” on the subject of a currency union. It said the supposed economists were “split” on the issues of returning to fixed exchange rates or even abolishing Canada’s fiat dollar and replacing it with American Federal Reserve fiat currency.

The cable gives the final word on the topic of a currency union to the Canadian central bank boss. He is quoted as saying that "monetary union is an issue that should be considered once we have made more progress towards establishing a single market."
Secrets, Backers

The scheme to merge North America into a political unit with its own legislature and currency is largely the brainchild of the world government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations. But though documents leaked earlier this year revealed that governments were trying to keep the process under wraps, integration is now proceeding out in the open for the most part.

Where the campaign will eventually end remains to be seen. But if North American Union advocates get their way, the U.S. Constitution and its Mexican and Canadian counterparts could soon be rendered irrelevant. After that, plugging the regional units into a global system would be a relatively simple matter, critics and supporters both argue.

Be sure to go to the site to see the article with all the hyperlinked source documents:
This info was provided to me by Stephanie Jasky,

Saturday, April 30, 2011



What is the Republican Party in 2011? Who is in it and what does it represent anymore? Who CLAIM to be Conservatives? I sure as hell don't know, which explains why I've been an Independent voter since Bob Dole ran for president against the rapist Bill Clinton in '94. This is how it all boils down and why Kenyan-born Muslim Barack Hussein Obama will win a second term unless YOU PEOPLE get your collective head out of your ass. Please, allow yours truly:

• Bill O'Reilly hates Rush Limbaugh.
• Karl Rove, George H.W. and Barbara Bush hate 2012 President-elect Sarah Palin.
• Ann Coulter hates Birthers, most of whom hail from the right.
• Meghan McCain hates any Republican over fifty who does not support the wanton slaughtering of defenseless babies in the womb. I guess this includes her decidedly progressive father who hates George W. Bush.
• Charles Krauthammer hates Donald Trump and Christine O'Donnell.
• Donald Trump hates Republicans, Conservatives and the Tea Party.
• Bill Krystol hates Glenn Beck. 
• Mike Huckabee hates Mormons, especially Mitt Romney.
• Establishment, country club, elitist progressives from the Republican Party hate ALL true Conservative women running for any office.
• Lindsey Graham also hates women, but for an entirely different reason. 
• George H.W. Bush hated Ronaldus Magnus Reaganus, which explains why he tried to have him killed.
• Ron Paul hates RINOs...who doesn't?
• Colin Powell hates the G.O.P. and will support any candidate who is black, even if it were the Prince of Darkness himself, Satan. Oh wait, he already did in 2008. My bad...carry on.
• Dana Perrino hates Michele Bachmann and any of those confused hicks representing the Tea Party.
• Susan Collins loves Olympia Snowe and BOTH hate Conservatism.
• Scott Brown once heard of a Conservative in Massachusetts, but immediately discovered that it was an ancient legend.
• Charlie Christ hates Marco Rubio, who also happens to hate a Conservative solution to illegal aliens.
• The Tea Party hates cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid or unemployment compensation. "Cut theirs, not mine." According to recent polls reacting to Paul Ryan's proposed budget, this makes the Tea Party a gaggle of hypocrites...if you believe the polls.
• Laura Ingraham hates Arlen Specter, who jumped ship because "I didn't leave the Republican Party - the Republican Party left me." 
• Mitt Romney hates the U.S. Constitution, but loves waffles.
• Jeb Bush hates American sovereignty and freedom.
• Mitch McConnell hates anyone taking away his pork barrel projects for his own constituency and will always vote against spending cuts.
• John Boehner hates Paul Ryan's budget plan.
• Nobody liked Gerald Ford.
• No Republican today has EVER heard of Calvin Coolidge or how he managed to solve the Even Greater Depression of 1921. They don't even want to know about it. Get lost.
• Michael Savage hates 'em all. 

Do you see what we're faced with? You people are all over the damn place with no foundation in principles, values or vision. The way I see it, the ONLY politicians or players out there who represent TRUE Conservative ideals are: 

• 2012 President-elect Sarah Palin
• Congressman Allen West
• Congresswoman Michele Bachmann
• Senator Jim DeMint
• Governor Chris Christie
• Congressman Mike Pence
• Governor Mitch Daniels
• Congressman Jason Chaffetz
• Congressman Darrell Issa
• Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

Now, you go back to your gray and meaningless lives and think about whether you're a Republican or Conservative, because they are NOT the same. And ya better think twice in calling yourself a Conservative if you support a progressive like Jeb Bush, who is decidedly moderate. 

The G.O.P. has become Democrat Light and many are straddling the middle ground. You know the type: "Uh, well, I'm a fiscal conservative and a social liberal." I HATE THESE PEOPLE or anyone who says this. I prefer what John Adams said: "In politics the middle way is none at all."

H/T Sidney Salgado

NOTE:  I don't necessarily agree with Mr. Salgado's every statement. But, he has something there to ponder on.  We better be careful and come together better sooner than later, otherwise the USA as we know it will be gone.